Friday, January 02, 2009

"New Council" Takes Charge

President-elect Barack Obama and the late Mayor Albert T. McWilliams were the unseen but strongly-felt presences at the City Council’s annual reorganization Thursday.

New City Council President Rashid Burney said he spent the last two years working on the Obama campaign and will attend his inauguration, deeming it as historic an event as putting a man on the moon. In that spirit, he asked city residents to embrace the “new patriotism” of service to the community through voluntarism and increased civic engagement.

“Plainfield is what we make it,” he said.

New Citywide at-large Councilwoman Annie C. McWilliams tearfully recalled her late father, the city’s first two-term mayor, after being sworn in with her mother, grandmother and four siblings at her side.

“He taught me that public service is not a right, it is a privilege,” she said.

Third Ward Councilman Adrian Mapp called for “transformational change” and belt-tightening as the city and the nation face the worst economic times since the Great Depression. To set an example, he is foregoing city health benefits and will not take the opt-out payment, he said.

Mapp and McWilliams overcame incumbents in the June primary and their November election revived the vitality of the late mayor’s progressive “New Democrat” organization. Their campaign promised greater transparency and accountability in government, a theme bolstered by some Burney’s stated goals for 2009, including putting all council documents online and televising meetings.

“We want you to see what we are doing,” Burney said.

The governing body and the administration have clashed over communication between the two branches over the past three years and as Mayor Sharon Robinson-Briggs begins the last year of her term, Thursday was no exception. The council rejected a number of mayoral appointments because the names were only offered on New Year’s Eve.

In her State of the City address, Robinson-Briggs called crime the top priority for 2009 and promised a crackdown on illegal dumping. Among her accomplishments, she cited improvements in information technology that placed “all major departments on a single grid.” She predicted completion of a new senior center by spring and pledged to continue the fight to restore an acute care hospital facility in the city.

After her speech, Robinson-Briggs and her husband, Peter, presented a slide show on accomplishments of each city department and division, with many statistics. She then handed out a new map, a Homeowner’s Handbook and a city phone directory, after which most of the audience left.

The second two hours of the meeting began with the council taking up new business, but McWilliams called for tabling of the six resolutions naming mayoral appointees to various boards and commissions. After the vote passed, Councilman Cory Storch said the information was only received at 6 p.m. Wednesday and the council had no chance to interview new appointees to the Zoning Board of Adjustment and the Planning Board.

The council has asked the administration to allow time for interviews of newcomers to the land use boards to make sure applicants are well-qualified to serve. The boards play a key role in redevelopment in addition to upholding the master plan and zoning ordinance that shape the city’s character.

However, the tabling set off what resident Dottie Gutenkauf later called “gyrations,” a series of reconsiderations that ended with the council approving re-appointment of incumbents to the boards and to the Historic Preservation Commission while still insisting on interviews with new nominees. In public comment, Gutenkauf said the action would leave the Historic Preservation Commission without a quorum in January.

A similar controversy broke out over the use of city-owned vehicles, starting with tabling of a resolution to allow City Administrator Marc Dashield 24-hour use of one. Council members said the privilege should be examined and perhaps be considered part of administrators’ compensation packages.

After a confusing series of votes, the council approved year-long use of a city-owned vehicle only for the mayor and the fire chief. Approvals for the city administrator, director of Public Affairs & Safety and superintendent of Public Works passed only for January, pending further discussion of compensation.

“This is really a very a dangerous precedent for the city,” Burney said.

Without a competitive compensation package, he said, Plainfield “will have to go to the bottom of the barrel to get people.”

In public comment, Barbara James, the mayor’s confidential aide and designee to the Planning Board, said, “I see we’re going to have some very lively sessions.”

James chided the council for not filling the vacancies on boards and commissions, saying the nominees were all volunteers.

Gutenkauf said she seconded James’ comments and asked the council to think about “folks watching at home,” who may view the council’s behavior on Channel 74.

But Storch later said, “This is a new council, not just two new people. It’s a new dynamic.”

Admitting the council needed to do better than it did Thursday and anticipating more struggle, Storch nonetheless said, “I feel optimistic about this year.”

Reiterating his point about a new council, Storch said the administration could not provide information at the eleventh hour and expect “a thinking council” to rubberstamp it.

“Let’s be clear. We want to work with the administration,” he said, but added yet another caveat not to expect blanket approvals in 2009.

--Bernice Paglia

13 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

First 2 term Mayor ? Didn't
O'Kefe serve 8 years in the new charter?

9:33 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Adrian Mapp is on the Roselle payroll--I believe he is the chief financial officer, whatever that position is called there (it's a political appointment) and gets health benefits in addition to his salary, so he doesn't need Plainfield's benefits. Council members who get health care coverage through their employment shouldn't get them from Plainfield too.

We have been to almost every reorganization meeting since 1983 and have never before seen such a display and such smirks as we saw this year. Nor have any of those previous reorg meetings lasted as long (until after 4 pm). I hope those who left early will get a chance to watch it on Channel 74 so they can see what they missed.

Congratulations to Council president Rashid Burney and chairwoman Linda Carter for doing their best to turn lemons into lemonade.

10:55 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Following on Dottie Gutenkauf's comment: Is Jennifer Wenson-Maier getting any two-fer benefits (from Rahway + Plainfield)? Is so, I think Dottie ought to decry that situation too.

12:59 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I am glad that the new council is taking another look and not rubberstamping the mayor's political appointees to boards and commissions, especially when they are made at the last minute. It is very troubling that the mayor's politically appointed "confidential aide" Barbara James would be expecting to get appointed to the planning board. The council deserves to see resumes. Maybe if they had done that when the mayor first was elected, we wouldn't have had so many musical chairs regarding her department heads, many of whom have left or couldn't be bonded and confirmed. Remember Carlton McGee? Ray Daniels? Peck, to name a few? Yes it will take a bit of time for the council to get working together. If the mayor had been more forthcoming and gracious in communicating with the new council members about her plans, maybe there wouldn't have been so much confusion. I think the council should move slowly and carefully. However I think that the superintendent of Public Works should have a 24 hour vehicle, in case of an emergency as well as Hellwig. I do like the demand for accountability though. Does Hellwig live in town, Bernice?

1:04 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I do not recall Jennifer W-M preaching that she is saving the city any money. We do not know what she is doing. Mr. Mapp did.So that is why he is under scrutiny.

4:51 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

To the 4:51 pm comment as well as Dottie Gutenkauf: I am glad that Mapp is not taking benefits, since he is getting them from his day job as Ms. Gutenkauf stated. I think it is commendable that he is also opting out of the one-time cash payment, which he didn't have to do. I think it's unkind to say that he was "preaching" as 4:51 said. I would hope that the other council members who have benefits from other employment would also opt out as well as forego the cash payment. It may not save as much money as we all like, but it is a cost savings to the city. Let's stop being so cynical. I look forward to a productive new year.

9:26 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

"Preaching" isn't my point. It doesn't matter whether Jennifer W-M (or anyone else for that matter) "preaches" about anything relating to benefits, the mere fact getting dual benefits shouldn't be allowed. And under the present economic circumstances of the city and the state, it's unconscionable.

If any city employee is getting double benefits I think they should be rolled back to one set of benefits, just like the rest of us. (Humm, don't I recall that former council president Gibson received some sort of double benefit perk too?)

9:35 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Another "perk" that could well be eliminated (and would save the city some money) would be the elimination of cell phones paid for by the city for council members. I think they probably all have their own cell phones already (doesn't everyone?) and could use them, or their home phones, for city business. I'm sure they all have voice mail, so people can leave messages for them. Any extra expenses they incur could be billed to the city and reimbursed. And frankly, I think that if they want city employees to take a pay cut, they should be prepared to do so too.

As for Jenny W-M, I don't know whether or not Rahway council members get salaries or health benefits--if they don't, she isn't double-dipping from her employment here. And frankly, I don't know why Plainfield council members get health benefits at all--I think they are all otherwise employed, but perhaps I'm mistaken. If they're already covered elsewhere, they shouldn't be covered here, and shouldn't have the "opt-out for a cash payment" option either.

Besides, full health insurance or a cash "opt-out" payment for a "job" that pays something like $10K a year is ridiculous, given what so many full-time and part-time workers (and retirees too) have to pay for health insurance--that is, if they're lucky enough to get it at all!

9:38 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Adrian Mapp is double dipping. If he wants to save the city any money he should forgo his $10,000 salary. As it stands now, he is double dipping. That should not be allowed given the tough economic conditions the city is facing.

By the way, Mapp is an OK guy. I am not sure he has the leadership skills to be Mayor. Maybe Councilman of the 3rd ward.

But he did preach. Some even called it grandstanding.

1:32 AM  
Blogger Bernice said...

So then what would you say about a recent instance where a council member received a six-figure county salary, a $60,000 pension from public employment and $10,000 here?

1:50 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I'd say that person worked in public service for a long time and earned that salary and pension.

The health insurance is a different issue.

9:51 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Well, in that case I would answer the Anonymous commenter (9:51 am) that the councilperson Bernice referenced, in the interests of public service, should have graciously given up the 10K from Plainfield. That individual has more than enough income compared to the average Plainfield resident and in light of the city's financial situation. But...that person is no longer on the council, right? So that particular situation has taken care of itself.

1:49 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

All double-dipping is wrong. Mapp is double-dipping. That is wrong.

3:26 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home